Surekh Balasaheb Salunke vs Janardhan Kisan Salunke — 556/2023

Case under Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act Section 19. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th August 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 10-Aug-2026 in 2 days

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHBI110021102023

Filing Number

1037/2023

Filing Date

14-Jun-2023

Registration No

556/2023

Registration Date

15-Jun-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Georai

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Surekh Balasaheb Salunke

    Adv. Kale V.A.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Janardhan Kisan Salunke

  2. 2.Balasaheb Janardhan Salunke

  3. 3.Prakash Janardhan Salunke

  4. 4.Mirabai Balasaheb Salunke

Case History

  1. 10-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  4. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  5. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  6. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  7. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  8. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  9. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  10. 22-Apr-2025

    List of Witness

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  11. 17-Mar-2025

    List of Witness

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  12. 11-Feb-2025

    List of Witness

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  13. 07-Jan-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain defendants from creating third-party interest in agricultural properties. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss, noting that many properties were not jointly owned and some claimants were not made parties to the suit. Additionally, the court held that the matrimonial dispute falls under Family Court jurisdiction, not civil court jurisdiction, making the suit prima facie untenable. Cost awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 07-Jan-2025

    Issues

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  15. 02-Jan-2025

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  16. 17-Dec-2024

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  17. 09-Dec-2024

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  18. 03-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  19. 23-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  20. 20-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  21. 12-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  22. 06-Jul-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  23. 06-Jul-2024

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  24. 04-May-2024

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  25. 20-Mar-2024

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  26. 11-Mar-2024

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  27. 20-Feb-2024

    Reply/Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  28. 30-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  29. 08-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  30. 29-Nov-2023

    List of Witness

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  31. 12-Oct-2023

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  32. 10-Oct-2023

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  33. 13-Sep-2023

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  34. 28-Jul-2023

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  35. 17-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  36. 16-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 14-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 556/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain defendants from creating third-party interest in agricultural properties. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss, noting that many properties were not jointly owned and some claimants were not made parties to the suit. Additionally, the court held that the matrimonial dispute falls under Family Court jurisdiction, not civil court jurisdiction, making the suit prima facie untenable. Cost awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case