Surekh Balasaheb Salunke vs Janardhan Kisan Salunke — 556/2023

Case under Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act Section 19. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th August 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHBI110021102023

Evidence

Next Hearing

10th August 2026

Filing Number

1037/2023

Filing Date

14-06-2023

Registration No

556/2023

Registration Date

15-06-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Georai

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. GEORAI

Acts & Sections

HINDU ADOPTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACT Section 19

Petitioner(s)

Surekh Balasaheb Salunke

Adv. Kale V.A.

Respondent(s)

Janardhan Kisan Salunke

Balasaheb Janardhan Salunke

Prakash Janardhan Salunke

Mirabai Balasaheb Salunke

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. GEORAI

04-05-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

28-01-2026

Evidence

15-12-2025

Evidence

28-10-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

07-01-2025
Order on T.I.

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain defendants from creating third-party interest in agricultural properties. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss, noting that many properties were not jointly owned and some claimants were not made parties to the suit. Additionally, the court held that the matrimonial dispute falls under Family Court jurisdiction, not civil court jurisdiction, making the suit prima facie untenable. Cost awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain defendants from creating third-party interest in agricultural properties. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss, noting that many properties were not jointly owned and some claimants were not made parties to the suit. Additionally, the court held that the matrimonial dispute falls under Family Court jurisdiction, not civil court jurisdiction, making the suit prima facie untenable. Cost awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Georai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case