Bapu Patilbuwa Gadade vs Bhagwan Patilbuwa Gadade — 409/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI110017062024
Next Hearing
13th July 2026
e-Filing Number
10-06-2024
Filing Number
827/2024
Filing Date
10-06-2024
Registration No
409/2024
Registration Date
11-06-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Georai
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. GEORAI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bapu Patilbuwa Gadade
Adv. Nakade S.B.
Respondent(s)
Bhagwan Patilbuwa Gadade
Abhiman Bhagwan Gadade
Sandip Abhiman Gadade
Rahul Abhiman Gadade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. GEORAI
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 13-10-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff Bapu's application for temporary injunction against defendant Bhagwan regarding disputed agricultural land in Block No. 569. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or risk of irreparable loss, primarily because a necessary party (Indubai Satyabhan Gadade, who received transferred land from both brothers) was not impleaded in the suit, and the exact boundaries of the partitioned fields were unclear due to missing partition documents. Cost awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff Bapu's application for temporary injunction against defendant Bhagwan regarding disputed agricultural land in Block No. 569. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or risk of irreparable loss, primarily because a necessary party (Indubai Satyabhan Gadade, who received transferred land from both brothers) was not impleaded in the suit, and the exact boundaries of the partitioned fields were unclear due to missing partition documents. Cost awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts