Bapu Patilbuwa Gadade vs Bhagwan Patilbuwa Gadade — 409/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 13-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHBI110017062024

e-Filing Number

10-06-2024

Filing Number

827/2024

Filing Date

10-Jun-2024

Registration No

409/2024

Registration Date

11-Jun-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Georai

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bapu Patilbuwa Gadade

    Adv. Nakade S.B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhagwan Patilbuwa Gadade

  2. 2.Abhiman Bhagwan Gadade

  3. 3.Sandip Abhiman Gadade

  4. 4.Rahul Abhiman Gadade

Case History

  1. 13-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  5. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  6. 13-Oct-2025

    Issues

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  7. 25-Aug-2025

    Issues

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  8. 24-Jun-2025

    Issues

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  9. 23-Apr-2025

    Issues

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  10. 06-Mar-2025

    Issues

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  11. 31-Jan-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff Bapu's application for temporary injunction against defendant Bhagwan regarding disputed agricultural land in Block No. 569. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or risk of irreparable loss, primarily because a necessary party (Indubai Satyabhan Gadade, who received transferred land from both brothers) was not impleaded in the suit, and the exact boundaries of the partitioned fields were unclear due to missing partition documents. Cost awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 31-Jan-2025

    Issues

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  13. 21-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  14. 10-Jan-2025

    Amended W.S.

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  15. 02-Jan-2025

    Amended Plaint

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  16. 23-Dec-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  17. 20-Dec-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  18. 11-Dec-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  19. 03-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  20. 21-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  21. 12-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  22. 23-Oct-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  23. 23-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  24. 09-Oct-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  25. 01-Oct-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  26. 27-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  27. 21-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  28. 18-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  29. 27-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  30. 13-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  31. 05-Aug-2024

    No W.S. Order

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  32. 29-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  33. 24-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai

  34. 12-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 10-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 409/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff Bapu's application for temporary injunction against defendant Bhagwan regarding disputed agricultural land in Block No. 569. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or risk of irreparable loss, primarily because a necessary party (Indubai Satyabhan Gadade, who received transferred land from both brothers) was not impleaded in the suit, and the exact boundaries of the partitioned fields were unclear due to missing partition documents. Cost awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case