Bapu Patilbuwa Gadade vs Bhagwan Patilbuwa Gadade — 409/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHBI110017062024

Evidence

Next Hearing

13th July 2026

e-Filing Number

10-06-2024

Filing Number

827/2024

Filing Date

10-06-2024

Registration No

409/2024

Registration Date

11-06-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Georai

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. GEORAI

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

Bapu Patilbuwa Gadade

Adv. Nakade S.B.

Respondent(s)

Bhagwan Patilbuwa Gadade

Abhiman Bhagwan Gadade

Sandip Abhiman Gadade

Rahul Abhiman Gadade

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. GEORAI

07-05-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

04-02-2026

Evidence

10-12-2025

Evidence

13-10-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

31-01-2025
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff Bapu's application for temporary injunction against defendant Bhagwan regarding disputed agricultural land in Block No. 569. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or risk of irreparable loss, primarily because a necessary party (Indubai Satyabhan Gadade, who received transferred land from both brothers) was not impleaded in the suit, and the exact boundaries of the partitioned fields were unclear due to missing partition documents. Cost awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff Bapu's application for temporary injunction against defendant Bhagwan regarding disputed agricultural land in Block No. 569. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or risk of irreparable loss, primarily because a necessary party (Indubai Satyabhan Gadade, who received transferred land from both brothers) was not impleaded in the suit, and the exact boundaries of the partitioned fields were unclear due to missing partition documents. Cost awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Georai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case