Krushna Vishnu Darafe vs Rita Vishnu Darafe — 174/2026
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI110006192026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
315/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
174/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Georai
Judge
2-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Krushna Vishnu Darafe
Adv. Kale S.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rita Vishnu Darafe
-
2.Rohini Datta Shelke
-
3.Nikita Yogesh Gholap
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary The Lok Adalat (Georai, Beed) approved an amicable settlement between Krushna Darafe and Reeta Darafe in a property partition suit. Both parties mutually agreed to divide their respective shares in the suit properties and undertook not to raise objections to the partition, with cooperation required for implementation. The Award is enforceable as a Civil Court decree upon registration and relinquishment of rights as per applicable laws, with the plaintiff entitled to court fee refund. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
13-Mar-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
12-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Georai
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 174/2026
Case Summary The Lok Adalat (Georai, Beed) approved an amicable settlement between Krushna Darafe and Reeta Darafe in a property partition suit. Both parties mutually agreed to divide their respective shares in the suit properties and undertook not to raise objections to the partition, with cooperation required for implementation. The Award is enforceable as a Civil Court decree upon registration and relinquishment of rights as per applicable laws, with the plaintiff entitled to court fee refund. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts