State of Maharashtra Through Georai Police Station vs Amol Baban Ade Kondayya — 78/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304,3(5). Status: N.B.W._Unready. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHBI110004952026

N.B.W._Unready

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

260/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

78/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Georai

Judge

3-Jt. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. GEORAI

FIR Details

FIR Number

629

Police Station

Georai Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Georai Police Station

Respondent(s)

Amol Baban Ade Kondayya

Kuldeep Arjun Pawar

Adv. null

Vishal Yashwant Pawar

Adv. null

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Jt. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. GEORAI

22-05-2026

N.B.W._Unready

06-05-2026

N.B.W._Unready

23-04-2026

N.B.W._Unready

10-04-2026

N.B.W._Unready

08-04-2026

N.B.W._Unready

Interim Orders

10-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Bail Application Rejected The court rejected the bail application of accused no.2 in a robbery case involving theft of gold ornaments worth approximately Rs.1,00,100. Although the accused claimed false implication and financial hardship as the family's sole earner, the court found evidence of his active involvement in selling stolen gold ornaments and deemed him a flight risk due to his criminal antecedent and multiple residences, making it unlikely he would remain present throughout the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Bail Application Rejected The court rejected the bail application of accused no.2 in a robbery case involving theft of gold ornaments worth approximately Rs.1,00,100. Although the accused claimed false implication and financial hardship as the family's sole earner, the court found evidence of his active involvement in selling stolen gold ornaments and deemed him a flight risk due to his criminal antecedent and multiple residences, making it unlikely he would remain present throughout the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Georai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case