State of Maharashtra Through Georai Police Station vs Amol Baban Ade Kondayya — 78/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304,3(5). Status: N.B.W._Unready. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHBI110004952026
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2026
Filing Number
260/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
78/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Georai
Judge
3-Jt. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. GEORAI
FIR Details
FIR Number
629
Police Station
Georai Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Georai Police Station
Respondent(s)
Amol Baban Ade Kondayya
Kuldeep Arjun Pawar
Adv. null
Vishal Yashwant Pawar
Adv. null
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. GEORAI
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 06-05-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 23-04-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 10-04-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 08-04-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
Interim Orders
Bail Application Rejected The court rejected the bail application of accused no.2 in a robbery case involving theft of gold ornaments worth approximately Rs.1,00,100. Although the accused claimed false implication and financial hardship as the family's sole earner, the court found evidence of his active involvement in selling stolen gold ornaments and deemed him a flight risk due to his criminal antecedent and multiple residences, making it unlikely he would remain present throughout the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Bail Application Rejected The court rejected the bail application of accused no.2 in a robbery case involving theft of gold ornaments worth approximately Rs.1,00,100. Although the accused claimed false implication and financial hardship as the family's sole earner, the court found evidence of his active involvement in selling stolen gold ornaments and deemed him a flight risk due to his criminal antecedent and multiple residences, making it unlikely he would remain present throughout the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts