Sajjad Munshi Shaikh vs Omprakash Jagannath Bhansali Advocate - Kulkarni R.S. — 487/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHBI100021192022

Issues

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

Filing Number

880/2022

Filing Date

09-11-2022

Registration No

487/2022

Registration Date

09-11-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kaij

Judge

4-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. KAIJ.

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Saledeed,Cancellation

Petitioner(s)

Sajjad Munshi Shaikh

Adv. Chincholkar N.M.

Respondent(s)

Omprakash Jagannath Bhansali Advocate - Kulkarni R.S.

Surendra Sundar Raut

Mahemud Jafar Shaikh

Isak Jafar Shaikh

Gulab Jafar Shaikh

Ismail Jafar Shaikh(Legal Heir)

Murtuja Ibrahim Shaikh

Mustafa Ibrahim Shaikh(Legal Heir)

Mussa Ibrahim Shaikh(Legal Heir)

Sattar Ibrahim Shaikh

Jamir Ibrahim Shaikh

Hearing History

Judge: 4-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. KAIJ.

08-04-2026

Issues

12-03-2026

Issues

16-01-2026

Issues

16-12-2025

Issues

05-12-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

07-03-2024
Order on T.I.

Summary The court rejected the plaintiff Sajjad's application for temporary injunction under Order 39 CPC against defendant Omprakash. The court found no prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss in favor of the plaintiff, as the plaintiff failed to establish his legal ownership and the exact nature of his land share. The application was dismissed with costs imposed on the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the plaintiff Sajjad's application for temporary injunction under Order 39 CPC against defendant Omprakash. The court found no prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss in favor of the plaintiff, as the plaintiff failed to establish his legal ownership and the exact nature of his land share. The application was dismissed with costs imposed on the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kaij All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case