Akshay Raghavendra Shingare vs Dhanraj Parasram Sakhare Advocate - Galande S.L. — 173/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI100010902020
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
Filing Number
335/2020
Filing Date
27-07-2020
Registration No
173/2020
Registration Date
30-07-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kaij
Judge
4-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. KAIJ.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Akshay Raghavendra Shingare
Adv. Thorat Y.A.
Narayan Raghavendra Shingare
Respondent(s)
Dhanraj Parasram Sakhare Advocate - Galande S.L.
Chhabubai Parasram Sakhare
Mahadev Dattu Sakhare
Rukmin Mahadev Sakhare
Bashir Badshaha Sayyad
Manoj Bhairavnath Sakhare I.G.O. Usha Bhairavnath Sakhare
Hearing History
Judge: 4-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. KAIJ.
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 12-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 06-01-2026 | Compliance |
| 04-11-2025 | Compliance |
| 11-08-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition seeking to include two necessary parties (Dilip Anantrao Paule and Maruti Mahadev Sakharе) as Defendants 7 and 8 in this civil suit regarding property rights has been dismissed. The court found that adding these parties would not alter the nature of the suit, and directed the plaintiff to pay case costs of Rs. 500. The matter involves disputed land ownership claims in Kaij district, Karnataka. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition seeking to include two necessary parties (Dilip Anantrao Paule and Maruti Mahadev Sakharе) as Defendants 7 and 8 in this civil suit regarding property rights has been dismissed. The court found that adding these parties would not alter the nature of the suit, and directed the plaintiff to pay case costs of Rs. 500. The matter involves disputed land ownership claims in Kaij district, Karnataka. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts