STATE OF MAHARASHTRA. vs Prashant Suresh Chaudhari — 252/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 17th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHBI100009782024
Filing Number
546/2024
Filing Date
08-07-2024
Registration No
252/2024
Registration Date
08-07-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kaij
Judge
1-2ND JT. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. KAIJ
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
84
Police Station
Yusuf Wadgaon Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA.
Adv. A P P
Respondent(s)
Prashant Suresh Chaudhari
Mahadev Baburao Kate
Dilip Shivhar Chaudhari
Sanjay Raosaheb Chaudhari
Balasaheb Manikrao Chaudhari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2ND JT. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. KAIJ
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 20-01-2026 | Appearance |
| 10-09-2025 | Appearance |
| 02-07-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate convicted five accused persons under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act for gambling in a game called "Tirrat" and possessing Rs. 1,770, mobile phones, and gaming articles on 07.04.2024. All accused pleaded guilty voluntarily. They were sentenced to imprisonment till rising of court and fined Rs. 300 each (with 3 days simple imprisonment in default), while seized money was credited to the government and mobile phones were ordered returned to their owners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate convicted five accused persons under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act for gambling in a game called "Tirrat" and possessing Rs. 1,770, mobile phones, and gaming articles on 07.04.2024. All accused pleaded guilty voluntarily. They were sentenced to imprisonment till rising of court and fined Rs. 300 each (with 3 days simple imprisonment in default), while seized money was credited to the government and mobile phones were ordered returned to their owners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts