Gorakhnath Kondiba Bobde vs Surekha Kamlakar Kotule — 117/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI100006762024
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
25-04-2024
Filing Number
319/2024
Filing Date
26-04-2024
Registration No
117/2024
Registration Date
29-04-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kaij
Judge
1-2ND JT. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. KAIJ
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gorakhnath Kondiba Bobde
Adv. Aarde A.H.
Raman Gorakhnath Bobde
Respondent(s)
Surekha Kamlakar Kotule
Chintaman Vyankatrav Bobde
Vanmala Chintaman Bobde
Santosh Chintaman Bobde
Laxman Chintaman Bobde
Sulochana Haribhau Bobde
Haribhau Vishwanath Bobde
Ashok Vyankati Kotule
Aditya Bibhishan Kotule
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2ND JT. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. KAIJ
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
List of Witness
List of Witness
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 12-11-2025 | List of Witness |
| 24-09-2025 | List of Witness |
Interim Orders
Summary: The defendants' application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC to reject the plaint for insufficient court fees was partly allowed. The court found that while the plaintiff failed to properly value the suit and pay requisite court fees under Sections 6(d) and 6(v) of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959, the plaint disclosed a valid cause of action and could not be summarily rejected. The plaintiff was granted an opportunity to correct the valuation and pay the necessary court fees before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The defendants' application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC to reject the plaint for insufficient court fees was partly allowed. The court found that while the plaintiff failed to properly value the suit and pay requisite court fees under Sections 6(d) and 6(v) of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959, the plaint disclosed a valid cause of action and could not be summarily rejected. The plaintiff was granted an opportunity to correct the valuation and pay the necessary court fees before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts