Vanita Amol Adke vs Amol Gopichand Edake Advocate - Tapse S.S. — 92/2023
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 08th May 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHBI100004312023
e-Filing Number
02-03-2023
Filing Number
263/2023
Filing Date
03-03-2023
Registration No
92/2023
Registration Date
04-03-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kaij
Judge
4-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. KAIJ.
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vanita Amol Adke
Adv. Ghule S.M
Respondent(s)
Amol Gopichand Edake Advocate - Tapse S.S.
Gopichand Vishwanath Edake
Surekha Gopichand Edake
Pravin Gopichand Edake
Hearing History
Judge: 4-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. KAIJ.
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-05-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 23-04-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 12-03-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 20-01-2026 | Dismissal Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The JMFC Kaij disposed of a three-year-old domestic violence case (D.V. Act, 2005) filed by Vanita Amol Edake against Amol Gopichand Edake under Section 256 of Cr.P.C. The court closed the proceedings because the complainant failed to appear or pursue the case despite sufficient opportunities, and the matter served no fruitful purpose remaining pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The JMFC Kaij disposed of a three-year-old domestic violence case (D.V. Act, 2005) filed by Vanita Amol Edake against Amol Gopichand Edake under Section 256 of Cr.P.C. The court closed the proceedings because the complainant failed to appear or pursue the case despite sufficient opportunities, and the matter served no fruitful purpose remaining pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts