Sonali Maharudra Chopane vs Maharudra Siddhaling Chopane — 51/2026

Case under Partition Act Section 32. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEMENT BY MEDIATION on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHBI100003272026

e-Filing Number

11-02-2026

Filing Number

119/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

51/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kaij

Judge

3-Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Kaij

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLEMENT BY MEDIATION

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Partition Act Section 32

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sonali Maharudra Chopane

    Adv. Aarde A.H.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maharudra Siddhaling Chopane

  2. 2.Pushpa Maharudra Chopane

  3. 3.Shubham Maharudra Chopane

  4. 4.Shradha Maharudra Chopane

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court disposed of the suit between Sonali Maharudra Chopane and Maharudra Siddhling Chopane through a compromise settlement reached by both parties without undue influence or coercion. A decree was drawn up in accordance with the agreed compromise terms, making it executable upon compliance with legal provisions, and the plaintiff was granted a court fee refund. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Kaij

  4. 05-May-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Kaij

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Kaij

  6. 14-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Kaij

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Kaij

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 51/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the suit between Sonali Maharudra Chopane and Maharudra Siddhling Chopane through a compromise settlement reached by both parties without undue influence or coercion. A decree was drawn up in accordance with the agreed compromise terms, making it executable upon compliance with legal provisions, and the plaintiff was granted a court fee refund. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case