STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Lakhan Arjun Shinde — 9/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 30th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHBI100002252020
Filing Number
164/2020
Filing Date
27-01-2020
Registration No
9/2020
Registration Date
28-01-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kaij
Judge
3-JT. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. KAIJ
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
207
Police Station
Yusuf Wadgaon Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Respondent(s)
Lakhan Arjun Shinde
Arjun Baburao Shinde
Adv. Munde Anita R.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JT. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. KAIJ
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted both defendants (Lakhan Arjun Shinde, age 22, and Arjun Baburao Shinde, age 56) of all charges under IPC sections 324, 323, 504 with section 34, finding insufficient evidence to prove they intentionally caused injury to the complainant with a deadly weapon on December 19, 2019. The court ruled that the prosecution failed to establish the chain of events beyond reasonable doubt, as key witness testimonies were contradictory and crucial evidence like the seizure panchnama was not properly corroborated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted both defendants (Lakhan Arjun Shinde, age 22, and Arjun Baburao Shinde, age 56) of all charges under IPC sections 324, 323, 504 with section 34, finding insufficient evidence to prove they intentionally caused injury to the complainant with a deadly weapon on December 19, 2019. The court ruled that the prosecution failed to establish the chain of events beyond reasonable doubt, as key witness testimonies were contradictory and crucial evidence like the seizure panchnama was not properly corroborated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts