Chandrakala Babasaheb Bikkad vs Nil — 48/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2,8. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHBI100001972026
e-Filing Number
23-01-2026
Filing Number
86/2026
Filing Date
27-Jan-2026
Registration No
48/2026
Registration Date
28-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kaij
Judge
1-2Nd Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Kaij
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Chandrakala Babasaheb Bikkad
Adv. Dhakne B.N.
-
2.Prashant Babasaheb Bikkad
-
3.Pradip Babasaheb Bikkad
-
4.Surekha Vijaykumar Ghule
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted the applicant's petition and issued a succession certificate recognizing four individuals—Chandrika Babasaheb Bikad, Prashant Babasaheb Bikad, Pradip Babasaheb Bikad, and Surekhaa Vijayakumar Ghule—as the sole legal heirs of the deceased Babasaheb Dadarao Bikad, who died on 02.10.2025. The court found that the applicant's evidence, including the death certificate, affidavits, and identification documents, were credible and established that no other heirs existed, entitling them to access government and non-government benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
2Nd Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Kaij
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
2Nd Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C. Kaij
-
28-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 48/2026
The court granted the applicant's petition and issued a succession certificate recognizing four individuals—Chandrika Babasaheb Bikad, Prashant Babasaheb Bikad, Pradip Babasaheb Bikad, and Surekhaa Vijayakumar Ghule—as the sole legal heirs of the deceased Babasaheb Dadarao Bikad, who died on 02.10.2025. The court found that the applicant's evidence, including the death certificate, affidavits, and identification documents, were credible and established that no other heirs existed, entitling them to access government and non-government benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts