Shilabai Balasaheb Chate vs NIL — 25/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2,8. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI100001172026

e-Filing Number

14-01-2026

Filing Number

52/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

25/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kaij

Judge

4-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Kaij.

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2,8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shilabai Balasaheb Chate

    Adv. Neharkar N.H.

  2. 2.Ramesh Balasaheb Chate

  3. 3.Rahul Balasaheb Chate

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The court approved the petition and granted a succession certificate to Shilabai Balasaheb Chate and others as the legal heirs of the deceased Balasaheb Rangrao Chate, who died on 10.10.2024. The court found that the applicants satisfied all legal requirements under the Bombay Regulation Act VIII, 1827, including proper documentation of death and established succession, and therefore directed the issuance of the certificate in accordance with civil procedure rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Kaij.

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Kaij.

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Proclomation

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Kaij.

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Proclomation

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Kaij.

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court approved the petition and granted a succession certificate to Shilabai Balasaheb Chate and others as the legal heirs of the deceased Balasaheb Rangrao Chate, who died on 10.10.2024. The court found that the applicants satisfied all legal requirements under the Bombay Regulation Act VIII, 1827, including proper documentation of death and established succession, and therefore directed the issuance of the certificate in accordance with civil procedure rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case