STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Archana Ankush Gaikwad Advocate - Telgad N.S. — 1039/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(ई). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHBI090015492024

Filing Number

1547/2024

Filing Date

17-Oct-2024

Registration No

1039/2024

Registration Date

17-Oct-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Majalgaon

Judge

4-Joint JMFC, Majalgaon.

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

41

Police Station

Dindrud Police Station.

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(ई)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Archana Ankush Gaikwad Advocate - Telgad N.S.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Majalgaon acquitted the accused under the Mumbai Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical procedural failures, including the prosecution presenting only one witness, failing to properly examine the investigating officer and other police witnesses, and not following mandatory procedural requirements under CrPC Section 313. The accused was ordered released on personal bond of Rs. 15,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Joint JMFC, Majalgaon.

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint JMFC, Majalgaon.

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint JMFC, Majalgaon.

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint JMFC, Majalgaon.

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint JMFC, Majalgaon.

  8. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint JMFC, Majalgaon.

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint JMFC, Majalgaon.

  10. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Joint JMFC, Majalgaon.

  11. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Joint JMFC, Majalgaon.

  12. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Joint JMFC, Majalgaon.

  13. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Joint JMFC, Majalgaon.

  14. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Joint JMFC, Majalgaon.

  15. 21-Jun-2025

    Charge

    Joint JMFC, Majalgaon.

  16. 05-May-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    3rd J.m.f.c., Majalgaon.

  17. 25-Feb-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    3rd J.m.f.c., Majalgaon.

  18. 21-Dec-2024

    N.B.W._Unready

    3rd J.m.f.c., Majalgaon.

  19. 22-Oct-2024

    N.B.W._Unready

    3rd J.m.f.c., Majalgaon.

  20. 18-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 17-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1039/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Majalgaon acquitted the accused under the Mumbai Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical procedural failures, including the prosecution presenting only one witness, failing to properly examine the investigating officer and other police witnesses, and not following mandatory procedural requirements under CrPC Section 313. The accused was ordered released on personal bond of Rs. 15,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case