STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Archana Ankush Gaikwad Advocate - Telgad N.S. — 1039/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(ई). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd April 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHBI090015492024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1547/2024

Filing Date

17-10-2024

Registration No

1039/2024

Registration Date

17-10-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Majalgaon

Judge

4-JOINT JMFC, MAJALGAON.

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

41

Police Station

Dindrud Police Station.

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(ई)

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Archana Ankush Gaikwad Advocate - Telgad N.S.

Hearing History

Judge: 4-JOINT JMFC, MAJALGAON.

23-04-2026

Disposed

22-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

06-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

18-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

12-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

23-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Majalgaon acquitted the accused under the Mumbai Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical procedural failures, including the prosecution presenting only one witness, failing to properly examine the investigating officer and other police witnesses, and not following mandatory procedural requirements under CrPC Section 313. The accused was ordered released on personal bond of Rs. 15,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Majalgaon acquitted the accused under the Mumbai Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical procedural failures, including the prosecution presenting only one witness, failing to properly examine the investigating officer and other police witnesses, and not following mandatory procedural requirements under CrPC Section 313. The accused was ordered released on personal bond of Rs. 15,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Majalgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case