The State of Maharashtra Through Dr. Sumant Nagnathrao Wagh vs Dr. Suryakant Arjunrao Sable etc.2 Advocate - Sable R.R. — 1000175/2014
Case under Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (prohibition of Sex Selection) Act Section 23,25. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHBI090014132014
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
1001233/2014
Filing Date
22-08-2014
Registration No
1000175/2014
Registration Date
26-08-2014
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Majalgaon
Judge
2-2nd JMFC, MAJALGAON.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Dr. Sumant Nagnathrao Wagh
Adv. Chotpagar R.B.
Respondent(s)
Dr. Suryakant Arjunrao Sable etc.2 Advocate - Sable R.R.
Dr.Mrs. Kalpana Suryakant Sable
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd JMFC, MAJALGAON.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 21-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 24-09-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Accused No. 1 (Dr. Sabale) – Discharge Application Allowed The court granted the discharge application filed by Accused No. 1 under Section 245 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a PCPNDT Act violation case. The court found that while the sonography center was registered under Accused No. 2 (Dr. Kalpana Suryakant Sabale), the regulatory violations alleged could not be attributed to Accused No. 1 (her husband) as he was not the registered owner or operator. Additionally, the complaint failed to comply with mandatory Section 28 requirements of the PCPNDT Act regarding prior notice to authorities. No credible evidence established his direct involvement in the alleged violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Accused No. 1 (Dr. Sabale) – Discharge Application Allowed The court granted the discharge application filed by Accused No. 1 under Section 245 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a PCPNDT Act violation case. The court found that while the sonography center was registered under Accused No. 2 (Dr. Kalpana Suryakant Sabale), the regulatory violations alleged could not be attributed to Accused No. 1 (her husband) as he was not the registered owner or operator. Additionally, the complaint failed to comply with mandatory Section 28 requirements of the PCPNDT Act regarding prior notice to authorities. No credible evidence established his direct involvement in the alleged violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts