Manisha Pandurang Korde vs Pandurang Raosaheb Korde Advocate - Nisargandh R.A. — 54/2019
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 17,18,19,20,21,22,23. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHBI090012212019
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
1218/2019
Filing Date
18-07-2019
Registration No
54/2019
Registration Date
29-07-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Majalgaon
Judge
4-JOINT JMFC, MAJALGAON.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manisha Pandurang Korde
Adv. Gole N.R.
Kapil Pandurang Korde U.G.
Respondent(s)
Pandurang Raosaheb Korde Advocate - Nisargandh R.A.
Raosaheb Eknath Korde
Ashrubai Raosaheb Korde
Hearing History
Judge: 4-JOINT JMFC, MAJALGAON.
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 07-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 12-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 27-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary The Court partially allows the petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner (wife) is granted interim relief including a residential order of Rs. 2,500 monthly maintenance for herself and Rs. 500 for her child from the respondent (husband), effective from the date the petition was filed. The petition is partly dismissed regarding the respondent's claim for possession of jointly-held property, as the respondent lacks sufficient independent means of livelihood. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Court partially allows the petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner (wife) is granted interim relief including a residential order of Rs. 2,500 monthly maintenance for herself and Rs. 500 for her child from the respondent (husband), effective from the date the petition was filed. The petition is partly dismissed regarding the respondent's claim for possession of jointly-held property, as the respondent lacks sufficient independent means of livelihood. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts