Sakharam Maroti Dhumal vs state of Maharashtra — 55/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI090003042026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

304/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

55/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Majalgaon

Judge

2-2nd JMFC, MAJALGAON.

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Sakharam Maroti Dhumal

Adv. Hormale A D

Respondent(s)

state of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd JMFC, MAJALGAON.

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Arguments

06-03-2026

W.S. and Say

02-03-2026

W.S. and Say

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Court Decision Summary The 2nd Joint Civil Court in Majalgaon granted bail to the petitioner in a motor vehicle theft case under IPC Section 503 (2023), subject to furnishing a solvent surety of ₹5,00,000 and a personal bond of ₹4,00,000. The court held that since the vehicle was seized in connection with an offense, the petitioner (vehicle owner) is entitled to its return upon providing adequate security, as per Supreme Court precedent that vehicle owners cannot be denied possession merely because the vehicle is involved in a case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The 2nd Joint Civil Court in Majalgaon granted bail to the petitioner in a motor vehicle theft case under IPC Section 503 (2023), subject to furnishing a solvent surety of ₹5,00,000 and a personal bond of ₹4,00,000. The court held that since the vehicle was seized in connection with an offense, the petitioner (vehicle owner) is entitled to its return upon providing adequate security, as per Supreme Court precedent that vehicle owners cannot be denied possession merely because the vehicle is involved in a case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Majalgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case