Pandharinath Mahadev Kundkar vs Ganesh Malji Dugane Advocate - Sajgane J.S. — 17/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Ownership,Injunction. Status: Amended Plaint. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHBI080015822019
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
1587/2019
Filing Date
11-10-2019
Registration No
17/2019
Registration Date
14-10-2019
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Majalgaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, MAJALGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandharinath Mahadev Kundkar
Adv. Kure V.V.
Respondent(s)
Ganesh Malji Dugane Advocate - Sajgane J.S.
Malji Tatyarao Dugane
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, MAJALGAON
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 12-03-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 22-01-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 15-12-2025 | Amended Plaint |
| 14-11-2025 | Amended Plaint |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for amending the plaint under Order-VI, Rule-17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was allowed. The plaintiff is permitted to add allegations regarding a nominal sale deed (Registration No.814/2024 dated 15/02/2024) executed by Defendant No.1 in favor of Shakuntala Shrikrushan Raut during the suit's pendency, with a correction to reference "Defendant No.3" instead of "Defendant No.2." The plaintiff must pay additional court fees for the proposed relief of declaration and comply within the prescribed timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for amending the plaint under Order-VI, Rule-17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was allowed. The plaintiff is permitted to add allegations regarding a nominal sale deed (Registration No.814/2024 dated 15/02/2024) executed by Defendant No.1 in favor of Shakuntala Shrikrushan Raut during the suit's pendency, with a correction to reference "Defendant No.3" instead of "Defendant No.2." The plaintiff must pay additional court fees for the proposed relief of declaration and comply within the prescribed timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts