Farzana Begam Ahemadkhan Pathan vs Shaikh Maksud Shaikh Mahebub Advocate - Deshmukh D.L. — 280/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Partition,Possession. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI080010902022
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
1084/2022
Filing Date
24-06-2022
Registration No
280/2022
Registration Date
30-06-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Majalgaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, MAJALGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Farzana Begam Ahemadkhan Pathan
Adv. Shaikh Md.F.O., Syed N.S.
Rukhsana Begam Nawabkhan
Respondent(s)
Shaikh Maksud Shaikh Mahebub Advocate - Deshmukh D.L.
Shaikh Shakera Begam Babajani
Shaikh Nawab Babajani
Shaikh Nasrin Babajani
Adv. Inamdar M.H.
Shaikh Afrin Babajani
Shaikh Yasmin Babajani
Shaikh Wasim Babajani
Amina Begam Sayyad Hamid
Sultana Begam Shaikh Bashir
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, MAJALGAON
Compliance
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 12-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 11-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 27-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 02-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary The Civil Court allowed the application filed by defendants 4-7 to set aside the "No Written Statement" order dated 28/11/2023 and permitted them to submit their written statement, despite a 2-year delay in filing. The court imposed costs of Rs. 1,000 payable to plaintiffs, finding that adjudication on merits was desirable in this land partition suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Civil Court allowed the application filed by defendants 4-7 to set aside the "No Written Statement" order dated 28/11/2023 and permitted them to submit their written statement, despite a 2-year delay in filing. The court imposed costs of Rs. 1,000 payable to plaintiffs, finding that adjudication on merits was desirable in this land partition suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts