Laxmi @ Shital Mahadev Ghule vs Limbaji Kerba Pansare Advocate - Lavate V.B. — 16/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Partiton,Possession. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHBI080010812021
Next Hearing
01st July 2026
Filing Number
1090/2021
Filing Date
04-08-2021
Registration No
16/2021
Registration Date
12-08-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Majalgaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, MAJALGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Laxmi @ Shital Mahadev Ghule
Adv. Shinde V.P.
Respondent(s)
Limbaji Kerba Pansare Advocate - Lavate V.B.
Mohan Limbaji Pansare
Sunita Pandurang Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, MAJALGAON
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 24-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 11-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Laxmi v. Limbaji +2 (Spl.C.S.No.16/2021) Outcome: The court rejected the defendants' application seeking rejection of the plaint under Order-VII, Rule-11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The plaintiff's partition suit will proceed on merits, as the court found the defendants' objections—regarding the plaintiff's lack of relation to defendants and alleged prior judgments—are matters to be decided on the substantive merits rather than grounds for plaint rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Laxmi v. Limbaji +2 (Spl.C.S.No.16/2021) Outcome: The court rejected the defendants' application seeking rejection of the plaint under Order-VII, Rule-11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The plaintiff's partition suit will proceed on merits, as the court found the defendants' objections—regarding the plaintiff's lack of relation to defendants and alleged prior judgments—are matters to be decided on the substantive merits rather than grounds for plaint rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts