Gangaram Ganpatrao Taur Lrs Gayabai Gangaram Taur vs Prakashchandra Bhikachand Duggad Advocate - Limgaonkar S.R. — 900104/2013

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI080001512013

Steps

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

900104/2013

Filing Date

06-08-2013

Registration No

900104/2013

Registration Date

13-08-2013

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Majalgaon

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, MAJALGAON

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

Gangaram Ganpatrao Taur Lrs Gayabai Gangaram Taur

Adv. Kulkarni A.M.

Prakash Gangara Taur

Adv. Kulkarni A.M.

Pratap Gangaram Taur

Adv. Kulkarni A.M.

Vijaymala Gangaram Taur

Adv. Kulkarni A.M.

Usha Gangaram Taur

Adv. Kulkarni A.M.

Sindhu Gangaram Taur

Adv. Kulkarni A.M.

Indubai Gangaram Taur

Adv. Kulkarni A.M.

Meera Gangaram Taur

Adv. Kulkarni A.M.

Respondent(s)

Prakashchandra Bhikachand Duggad Advocate - Limgaonkar S.R.

Satish Bhikchand Duggad

Suresh Bhikchand Duggad

Subhash Bhikchand Duggad

Bhikchand Uttamchand Duggad

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, MAJALGAON

28-04-2026

Steps

07-04-2026

Steps

12-03-2026

Steps

24-02-2026

Arguments

31-01-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

09-02-2017
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The application filed by legal heirs of the decree holder seeking commitment of opponents to civil prison under O.21 R.37 CPC was dismissed. The court found the application premature as it pertained to mense profit inquiry under O.20 R.12(c) CPC, the original decree was not yet final due to a pending Second Appeal before the High Court, and civil prison commitment provisions only apply at the execution stage when the decretal amount is actually due. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application filed by legal heirs of the decree holder seeking commitment of opponents to civil prison under O.21 R.37 CPC was dismissed. The court found the application premature as it pertained to mense profit inquiry under O.20 R.12(c) CPC, the original decree was not yet final due to a pending Second Appeal before the High Court, and civil prison commitment provisions only apply at the execution stage when the decretal amount is actually due. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Majalgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case