Kaveri Digambar Taur vs Govind Bapurao Darade — 1/2023

Case under Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 18th May 2026.

W.C.F.A.Case - Workmen Compensation Fatal Accident Case

CNR: MHBI080000672023

Case disposed

Filing Number

67/2023

Filing Date

05-01-2023

Registration No

1/2023

Registration Date

23-01-2023

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Majalgaon

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, MAJALGAON

Decision Date

18th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

Kaveri Digambar Taur

Adv. Deshmukh V.B.

Pallavi Digambar Taur

Pratibha Digambar Taur

Sonali Digambar Taur

Abhay Digambar Taur U/G mother

Ankushrao Pralhad Taur

Shakuntalabai Ankushrao Taur

Respondent(s)

Govind Bapurao Darade

Manager United India indurance Company Li.V.T.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, MAJALGAON

18-05-2026

Disposed

16-05-2026

Judgment

15-05-2026

Judgment

08-05-2026

Judgment

07-05-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

18-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The Civil Judge of Majalgaon partly allowed a compensation claim filed by the dependents of Digambar Taur, who died in a motor vehicle accident on 05/03/2018 while employed as a driver. The court found that Digambar was an employee of respondent No.1 (vehicle owner) and held both the owner and insurance company (respondent No.2) jointly and severally liable to pay Rs.8,84,200/- compensation with 12% simple interest from the accident date, plus an additional 50% penalty of Rs.4,42,100/- from the employer for failing to make timely provisional payment under the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Civil Judge of Majalgaon partly allowed a compensation claim filed by the dependents of Digambar Taur, who died in a motor vehicle accident on 05/03/2018 while employed as a driver. The court found that Digambar was an employee of respondent No.1 (vehicle owner) and held both the owner and insurance company (respondent No.2) jointly and severally liable to pay Rs.8,84,200/- compensation with 12% simple interest from the accident date, plus an additional 50% penalty of Rs.4,42,100/- from the employer for failing to make timely provisional payment under the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Majalgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case