Ashok Sukhdev Ranjwan vs Rukminbai Sukhdev Ranjwan Advocate - Sable R.R. — 900004/2011
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section PartionSeafaratePossesion. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHBI080000162011
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
900004/2011
Filing Date
18-01-2011
Registration No
900004/2011
Registration Date
31-01-2011
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Majalgaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, MAJALGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashok Sukhdev Ranjwan
Adv. Kulkarni A.M.
Chaya wo. Shriram Deshmukh
Adv. Kulkarni A.M.
Satyabhama wo. Sukhdev Ranjvan
Adv. Kulkarni A.M.
Respondent(s)
Rukminbai Sukhdev Ranjwan Advocate - Sable R.R.
Rukhminbai wo. Sukhdev Ranjvan
Adv. Sable R.R.
Asha wo. Ramesh Solanke
Adv. Sable R.R.
Usha wo. Sudam Solanke
Adv. Sable R.R.
Meera wo. Sopan Kharat
Adv. Sable R.R.
Sangita wo Pratap Game
Adv. Sable R.R.
Sweta wo Prashant Shinde
Adv. Sable R.R.
Devidas so. Rameshrao Solanke
Adv. Sable R.R.
Ravi so. Ramesh Solanke
Adv. Sable R.R.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, MAJALGAON
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 20-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the application filed by defendants Nos. 1 and 2 seeking to set aside the "No Written Statement" order passed against them on 03.12.2012. The application was filed on 04.08.2025 — more than 12 years and 8 months later — far beyond the 90-day statutory limit under Order-VIII, Rule-1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The court found the grounds cited (defendant's ill health and difficulty collecting documents) neither sound nor supported by documentary evidence, and held that approving such belated applications would frustrate the amendment's purpose of expediting civil suit disposal. The application was rejected with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the application filed by defendants Nos. 1 and 2 seeking to set aside the "No Written Statement" order passed against them on 03.12.2012. The application was filed on 04.08.2025 — more than 12 years and 8 months later — far beyond the 90-day statutory limit under Order-VIII, Rule-1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The court found the grounds cited (defendant's ill health and difficulty collecting documents) neither sound nor supported by documentary evidence, and held that approving such belated applications would frustrate the amendment's purpose of expediting civil suit disposal. The application was rejected with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts