The State of Maharashtra vs Ajij Mubarak Shaikh — 1040/2025

Case under Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Comm Section 6(b). Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHBI060031602025

e-Filing Number

25-11-2025

Filing Number

1863/2025

Filing Date

25-Nov-2025

Registration No

1040/2025

Registration Date

25-Nov-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Ambajaogai

Judge

2-IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 24-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

264

Police Station

Rural Police Station Ambajogai.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Comm Section 6(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ajij Mubarak Shaikh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Ambajogai First Class Magistrate Court convicted Aziz Mubarak Sheikh of violating the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003, Section 6(b), for selling tobacco products near a school on August 15, 2025. The accused pleaded guilty, and the court sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹200 or serve two days simple imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.

  5. 26-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1040/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Ambajogai First Class Magistrate Court convicted Aziz Mubarak Sheikh of violating the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003, Section 6(b), for selling tobacco products near a school on August 15, 2025. The accused pleaded guilty, and the court sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹200 or serve two days simple imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case