Hanumant Ganpat Survase vs Ravindra Achyut Hajare — 323/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,409,467,468,471,34. Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHBI060025992023
Next Hearing
16th July 2026
Filing Number
1523/2023
Filing Date
12-10-2023
Registration No
323/2023
Registration Date
12-10-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Ambajaogai
Judge
2-IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hanumant Ganpat Survase
Adv. Kurde D.B.
Respondent(s)
Ravindra Achyut Hajare
Anil Kashinath Rokde
Usha Sopan Survase
Dattatraya Giri
Adv. Choure R.S.
Ashok Manikrao Savadh
Arun B. Bhandari
Raghunath Vitthal Sarvade
Hearing History
Judge: 2-IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 12-03-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 26-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the petition filed under CrPC Section 239 to quash proceedings against accused nos. 4-6. The court found the charges against these three accused to be groundless as they had no involvement in the alleged crime, which was primarily committed by accused nos. 1-3. Additionally, there was insufficient documentary evidence to prove the allegations against accused nos. 4-6, and the case filed showed considerable delay in registration. Costs of the petition are to be decided at the final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the petition filed under CrPC Section 239 to quash proceedings against accused nos. 4-6. The court found the charges against these three accused to be groundless as they had no involvement in the alleged crime, which was primarily committed by accused nos. 1-3. Additionally, there was insufficient documentary evidence to prove the allegations against accused nos. 4-6, and the case filed showed considerable delay in registration. Costs of the petition are to be decided at the final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts