Bank Of Baroda vs Dilip Ghosuram Karnar — 586/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26order7rule2. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI060024322025
e-Filing Number
26-07-2025
Filing Number
2615/2025
Filing Date
30-Aug-2025
Registration No
586/2025
Registration Date
02-Sep-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Ambajaogai
Judge
2-IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bank Of Baroda
Adv. Ravindra Deshmukh
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dilip Ghosuram Karnar
-
2.Vilas Mahadeo Karnar
-
3.Amar Bhanudas Karnar
Case History
-
08-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Apr-2026
Awaiting Summons
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
12-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
15-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
14-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
03-Oct-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
03-Oct-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
03-Oct-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
03-Oct-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
03-Oct-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
03-Oct-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary This is a Nepalese court order (in Nepali language) dated 16/11/2026 regarding a property/inheritance dispute. The court dismissed the petitioner's case and upheld the lower court's decision, ordering the petitioner to pay court costs. The case involved property claims by four individuals, and the court determined the dismissal was justified based on legal grounds presented during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 586/2025
Summary This is a Nepalese court order (in Nepali language) dated 16/11/2026 regarding a property/inheritance dispute. The court dismissed the petitioner's case and upheld the lower court's decision, ordering the petitioner to pay court costs. The case involved property claims by four individuals, and the court determined the dismissal was justified based on legal grounds presented during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts