Sunita Shivram Dhigude vs Shivram Dashrath Dhigude — 784/2020
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 17th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHBI060023742020
Filing Number
2317/2020
Filing Date
07-Dec-2020
Registration No
784/2020
Registration Date
07-Dec-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Ambajaogai
Judge
1-IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sunita Shivram Dhigude
Adv. Lokhande V.S.
-
2.Nandini Shivram Dhigude
-
3.Kartik Shivram Dhigude
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shivram Dashrath Dhigude
-
2.Dashrath Shivram Dhigude
-
3.Indubai Dashrath Dhigude
-
4.Parmeshwar Dashrath Dhigude
-
5.Nilawati Ranu/Ranaba Bobade
-
6.Ranu/Ranba Motiram Babade
-
7.Lalita Pandit Padwale
-
8.Pandit Devrao Padwale
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Ambajogai Family Court dismissed a domestic violence case (M.A. No. 784/2020) filed by Sunita and others against Shivram and others for want of prosecution. The court found that the applicant had been absent for an extended period, taken no steps to advance the case in over 5 years, and demonstrated lack of interest in proceeding, making dismissal appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
12-Mar-2026
Dismissal Order
IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
07-Mar-2026
Dismissal Order
IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
12-Jan-2026
Dismissal Order
IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
10-Nov-2025
Dismissal Order
IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
02-Sep-2025
Dismissal Order
IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
05-Jul-2025
Dismissal Order
IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
01-Apr-2025
Dismissal Order
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
30-Dec-2024
Dismissal Order
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
19-Oct-2024
Dismissal Order
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
02-Aug-2024
Dismissal Order
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
15-Jun-2024
Evidence
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
20-Apr-2024
Evidence
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
16-Mar-2024
Evidence
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
02-Feb-2024
Evidence
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
21-Nov-2023
Evidence
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
16-Oct-2023
Evidence
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
23-Aug-2023
Evidence
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
20-Jul-2023
Evidence
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
22-Jun-2023
Evidence
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
10-May-2023
Evidence
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
16-Mar-2023
Evidence
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
04-Feb-2023
Evidence
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
09-Jan-2023
Evidence
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
03-Dec-2022
Evidence
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
21-Oct-2022
Evidence
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
20-Sep-2022
Evidence
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
26-Jul-2022
Evidence
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
08-Jun-2022
Evidence
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
20-Apr-2022
Evidence
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
14-Feb-2022
Evidence
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
16-Dec-2021
Evidence
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
23-Aug-2021
Appearance
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
21-Aug-2021
Appearance
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
10-Jun-2021
Appearance
IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
04-May-2021
Appearance
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
17-Mar-2021
Appearance
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
28-Jan-2021
Appearance
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
07-Dec-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Dec-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 784/2020
The Ambajogai Family Court dismissed a domestic violence case (M.A. No. 784/2020) filed by Sunita and others against Shivram and others for want of prosecution. The court found that the applicant had been absent for an extended period, taken no steps to advance the case in over 5 years, and demonstrated lack of interest in proceeding, making dismissal appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts