Bank Of Baroda vs pandit karbhari bidwe — 539/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26order7rule2. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHBI060023452025

e-Filing Number

17-07-2025

Filing Number

2333/2025

Filing Date

21-Aug-2025

Registration No

539/2025

Registration Date

25-Aug-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Ambajaogai

Judge

2-IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26order7rule2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bank Of Baroda

    Adv. Ravindra Deshmukh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.pandit karbhari bidwe

  2. 2.shahu karbhari bidwe

  3. 3.mahaling karbhari bidwe

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: In RCS No. 539/2025 (Bank of Badoda Vs. Pandit), the Lok Adalat Panel at Ambajogai disposed of the suit as withdrawn based on the plaintiff's pursis (withdrawal petition). The court ordered: (1) suit dismissed as withdrawn under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC 1908, (2) no costs awarded, and (3) court fee refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Steps_Unready

    IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.

  5. 06-Jan-2026

    Steps_Unready

    IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.

  6. 04-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.

  7. 26-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 539/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In RCS No. 539/2025 (Bank of Badoda Vs. Pandit), the Lok Adalat Panel at Ambajogai disposed of the suit as withdrawn based on the plaintiff's pursis (withdrawal petition). The court ordered: (1) suit dismissed as withdrawn under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC 1908, (2) no costs awarded, and (3) court fee refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case