THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Shrimant Prabhu Shinde — 540/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(A). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHBI060019362024
Filing Number
1000/2024
Filing Date
27-Aug-2024
Registration No
540/2024
Registration Date
27-Aug-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Ambajaogai
Judge
2-IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
220
Police Station
Rural Police Station Ambajogai.
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shrimant Prabhu Shinde
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The court discharged all accused under Section 258 CrPC in a gambling case registered under the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act because police failed to secure their presence despite repeated summons, with only two accused traced and no progress made. Seized cash of Rs. 650 was credited to the government, while worthless items were ordered destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
24-Feb-2026
Appearance
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
10-Dec-2025
Appearance
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
11-Sep-2025
Appearance
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
18-Jun-2025
Appearance
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
15-Apr-2025
Appearance
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
24-Jan-2025
Appearance
4th Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
24-Oct-2024
Appearance
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
27-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 540/2024
Summary The court discharged all accused under Section 258 CrPC in a gambling case registered under the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act because police failed to secure their presence despite repeated summons, with only two accused traced and no progress made. Seized cash of Rs. 650 was credited to the government, while worthless items were ordered destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts