THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs Subhan Chandu Parsuvale — 206/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(F). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 04th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHBI060007552024
Filing Number
376/2024
Filing Date
27-Mar-2024
Registration No
206/2024
Registration Date
28-Mar-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Ambajaogai
Judge
3-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 25-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
363
Police Station
Rural Police Station Ambajogai.
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Subhan Chandu Parsuvale
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court discharged accused Subhan Chandu Parasuwale of charges under section 65(f) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, by invoking section 258 of the CrPC. The discharge was ordered because the accused remained absent throughout proceedings despite multiple summons, making it futile to continue the case after the charge-sheet was filed on 28/03/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai
-
12-Mar-2026
Appearance
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai
-
05-Feb-2026
Appearance
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai
-
05-Dec-2025
Appearance
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai
-
08-Oct-2025
Appearance
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai
-
08-Jul-2025
Appearance
Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai
-
18-Mar-2025
Appearance
IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
15-Jan-2025
Appearance
IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
14-Oct-2024
Appearance
IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
25-Jul-2024
Appearance
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
03-May-2024
Appearance
IIIrd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
-
28-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 206/2024
The court discharged accused Subhan Chandu Parasuwale of charges under section 65(f) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, by invoking section 258 of the CrPC. The discharge was ordered because the accused remained absent throughout proceedings despite multiple summons, making it futile to continue the case after the charge-sheet was filed on 28/03/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts