Makardhwaj Bhaurao Chalak vs Police Inspector — 51/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI060005822026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

352/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

51/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Ambajaogai

Judge

3-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Makardhwaj Bhaurao Chalak

    Adv. Adv Baliram Angad puri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police Inspector

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court granted interim custody of the seized TATA LPT 3118 truck to applicant Makardhwaj Bhaurao Chalak, the registered owner, after he furnishes an indemnity bond of ₹25,00,000. The court found the applicant entitled to custody as investigation was complete and vehicle deterioration was possible under police custody, while imposing conditions requiring insurance verification, production during trial, detailed photographs, and prohibition against altering the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 51/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted interim custody of the seized TATA LPT 3118 truck to applicant Makardhwaj Bhaurao Chalak, the registered owner, after he furnishes an indemnity bond of ₹25,00,000. The court found the applicant entitled to custody as investigation was complete and vehicle deterioration was possible under police custody, while imposing conditions requiring insurance verification, production during trial, detailed photographs, and prohibition against altering the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case