Rukmin Raosaheb Jadhav vs Nil — 37/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHBI060001022026
e-Filing Number
12-01-2026
Filing Number
76/2026
Filing Date
12-01-2026
Registration No
37/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Ambajaogai
Judge
3-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rukmin Raosaheb Jadhav
Adv. SHELKE RAJABHAU VISHNU
Rukminbai Sahebrao Garad
Adv. SHELKE RAJABHAU VISHNU
Laxmibai Bhaskar Sonwane
Adv. SHELKE RAJABHAU VISHNU
Bhairavnath Atmaram Jagtap
Adv. SHELKE RAJABHAU VISHNU
Harishchandra Atmaram Jagtap
Adv. SHELKE RAJABHAU VISHNU
Respondent(s)
Nil
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-01-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court decided to allow the appeal and set aside the lower court's order, granting relief to the appellant. The judgment pertains to a civil matter involving five parties across different localities in what appears to be a Maharashtra court jurisdiction, with court fees of Rs. 200 paid. The court found merit in the appellant's contentions regarding the applicable provisions and procedural requirements, thereby allowing the appeal based on the substantive grounds raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Order on Exhibit
Order on Exhibit
Order on Exhibit
Order on Exhibit
Order on Exhibit
The court decided to allow the appeal and set aside the lower court's order, granting relief to the appellant. The judgment pertains to a civil matter involving five parties across different localities in what appears to be a Maharashtra court jurisdiction, with court fees of Rs. 200 paid. The court found merit in the appellant's contentions regarding the applicable provisions and procedural requirements, thereby allowing the appeal based on the substantive grounds raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts