Rukmin Raosaheb Jadhav vs Nil — 37/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI060001022026

e-Filing Number

12-01-2026

Filing Number

76/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Ambajaogai

Judge

3-Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rukmin Raosaheb Jadhav

    Adv. SHELKE RAJABHAU VISHNU

  2. 2.Rukminbai Sahebrao Garad

    Adv. SHELKE RAJABHAU VISHNU

  3. 3.Laxmibai Bhaskar Sonwane

    Adv. SHELKE RAJABHAU VISHNU

  4. 4.Bhairavnath Atmaram Jagtap

    Adv. SHELKE RAJABHAU VISHNU

  5. 5.Harishchandra Atmaram Jagtap

    Adv. SHELKE RAJABHAU VISHNU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court decided to allow the appeal and set aside the lower court's order, granting relief to the appellant. The judgment pertains to a civil matter involving five parties across different localities in what appears to be a Maharashtra court jurisdiction, with court fees of Rs. 200 paid. The court found merit in the appellant's contentions regarding the applicable provisions and procedural requirements, thereby allowing the appeal based on the substantive grounds raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai

  11. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai

  12. 26-Feb-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  13. 26-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  14. 26-Feb-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  15. 26-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  16. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai

  17. 15-Jan-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  18. 15-Jan-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  19. 15-Jan-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  20. 15-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  21. 15-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 37/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court decided to allow the appeal and set aside the lower court's order, granting relief to the appellant. The judgment pertains to a civil matter involving five parties across different localities in what appears to be a Maharashtra court jurisdiction, with court fees of Rs. 200 paid. The court found merit in the appellant's contentions regarding the applicable provisions and procedural requirements, thereby allowing the appeal based on the substantive grounds raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case