Asha Adinath alies Bandu Shep vs Saranjeet Kaur Tasvirsingh — 20/2016

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21R11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 20th April 2026.

MACP. Dkst. - Execution of Award in Motor Accident Claims

CNR: MHBI040013862016

Case disposed

Filing Number

523/2016

Filing Date

20-12-2016

Registration No

20/2016

Registration Date

21-12-2016

Court

District and Session Court , Ambajogai

Judge

7-District Judge-2 and Addl.Sessions JudgeAmbajogai.

Decision Date

20th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O21R11

Petitioner(s)

Asha Adinath alies Bandu Shep

Adv. Mankeshwar B.A.

Mahadeo Adinath Shep

Adv. Mankeshwar B.A.

Krishna Adinath Shep

Adv. Mankeshwar B.A.

Jayshri Adinath Shep

Adv. Mankeshwar B.A.

Keshav Arjun Shep..died

Rahibai Keshav Shep

Adv. Mankeshwar B.A.

Respondent(s)

Saranjeet Kaur Tasvirsingh

Kangoo Jayanta Varama

National Insurance Co.

Hearing History

Judge: 7-District Judge-2 and Addl.Sessions JudgeAmbajogai.

20-04-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Steps_Unready

24-12-2025

Steps_Unready

07-10-2025

Steps_Unready

14-07-2025

Steps_Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

20-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

The MACT (Maharashtra Agricultural Tribunal) at Ambajogai dismissed the application in default against Asha by Saranjeet because the decree holder and their advocate remained absent for an extended period and failed to take steps in the matter, indicating lack of interest. Given that the matter was already 9 years old, the court found it improper to allow the case to linger further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The MACT (Maharashtra Agricultural Tribunal) at Ambajogai dismissed the application in default against Asha by Saranjeet because the decree holder and their advocate remained absent for an extended period and failed to take steps in the matter, indicating lack of interest. Given that the matter was already 9 years old, the court found it improper to allow the case to linger further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court , Ambajogai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case