Ajay Vaijnath Jadhav vs Syed Ibrahim Syed Kathalu Advocate - Deogaonkar U.B. — 47/2020
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd May 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHBI040009272020
Filing Number
256/2020
Filing Date
29-10-2020
Registration No
47/2020
Registration Date
29-10-2020
Court
District and Session Court , Ambajogai
Judge
2-District Judge-1 Addl.Sessions JudgeAmbajogai.
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ajay Vaijnath Jadhav
Adv. Chaudhari D.V.
Respondent(s)
Syed Ibrahim Syed Kathalu Advocate - Deogaonkar U.B.
Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co. Ltd Parli.V.
Adv. Deogaonkar U.B.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge-1 Addl.Sessions JudgeAmbajogai.
Disposed
Citation
Citation
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-04-2026 | Citation |
| 24-04-2026 | Citation |
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 9,08,649 in compensation to claimant Ajay Jadhav for injuries sustained in a June 2018 motorcycle accident caused by rash and negligent driving of a tempo vehicle. The court found the claimant suffered 24% permanent disability (including amputation of two fingers), incurred medical expenses, and lost future earnings; the tribunal rejected the insurance company's defense of policy breach and determined respondents jointly liable with 7% annual interest until full realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 9,08,649 in compensation to claimant Ajay Jadhav for injuries sustained in a June 2018 motorcycle accident caused by rash and negligent driving of a tempo vehicle. The court found the claimant suffered 24% permanent disability (including amputation of two fingers), incurred medical expenses, and lost future earnings; the tribunal rejected the insurance company's defense of policy breach and determined respondents jointly liable with 7% annual interest until full realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts