Ajay Alias Samadhan Vachishta Lahane vs State of Maharashtra - P.I. Rural Police Station, Parli V. — 104/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 01st April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHBI040002342026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
173/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
104/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Ambajogai
Judge
7-District Judge-2 and Addl.Sessions JudgeAmbajogai.
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
336
Police Station
Rural Police Station Parli
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ajay Alias Samadhan Vachishta Lahane
Adv. Munde A.A.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra - P.I. Rural Police Station, Parli V.
Hearing History
Judge: 7-District Judge-2 and Addl.Sessions JudgeAmbajogai.
Disposed
Order
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Order |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge at Ambajogai allowed the bail application of Ajay, accused of offenses under the POCSO Act and child marriage laws involving a minor victim. The court found that while the victim's consent is legally invalid due to her age, there was no prima facie evidence of force or coercion in her leaving home, investigation was substantially complete, and continued custody was unwarranted; bail was granted with Rs. 25,000 surety and conditions including weekly police reporting and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Additional Sessions Judge at Ambajogai allowed the bail application of Ajay, accused of offenses under the POCSO Act and child marriage laws involving a minor victim. The court found that while the victim's consent is legally invalid due to her age, there was no prima facie evidence of force or coercion in her leaving home, investigation was substantially complete, and continued custody was unwarranted; bail was granted with Rs. 25,000 surety and conditions including weekly police reporting and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts