Govind Nagnath Chate vs State of Maharashtra - P.I. Police Station, Bardapur Advocate - Phad L.B. — 102/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 31st March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHBI040002322026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
171/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
102/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Ambajogai
Judge
7-District Judge-2 and Addl.Sessions JudgeAmbajogai.
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
68
Police Station
Bardapur Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govind Nagnath Chate
Adv. Lamb D.D.
Nagnath Namdeo Chate
Adv. Lamb D.D.
Bhagubai Nagnath Chate
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra - P.I. Police Station, Bardapur Advocate - Phad L.B.
Hearing History
Judge: 7-District Judge-2 and Addl.Sessions JudgeAmbajogai.
Disposed
Order
Filing of Affidavit
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Order |
| 25-03-2026 | Filing of Affidavit |
| 24-03-2026 | Order |
| 18-03-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected bail for the principal accused (Govind) in a case involving allegations of child abduction, forced marriage, and sexual assault of a minor, finding a strong prima facie case supported by medical evidence. However, the court granted bail to his parents (Applicants 2 and 3) with stringent conditions, determining that the material against them was weaker and their peripheral involvement as secondary accused did not warrant continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge rejected bail for the principal accused (Govind) in a case involving allegations of child abduction, forced marriage, and sexual assault of a minor, finding a strong prima facie case supported by medical evidence. However, the court granted bail to his parents (Applicants 2 and 3) with stringent conditions, determining that the material against them was weaker and their peripheral involvement as secondary accused did not warrant continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts