Sohel Mustfa Shaikh vs State of Maharashtra - P.I. City Police Station, Ambajogai Advocate - Phad L.B. — 76/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 31st March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHBI040001882026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
134/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
76/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Ambajogai
Judge
7-District Judge-2 and Addl.Sessions JudgeAmbajogai.
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
34
Police Station
Ambajogai Police StationCity
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sohel Mustfa Shaikh
Adv. Lomte A.R.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra - P.I. City Police Station, Ambajogai Advocate - Phad L.B.
Hearing History
Judge: 7-District Judge-2 and Addl.Sessions JudgeAmbajogai.
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Order |
| 23-03-2026 | Order |
| 20-03-2026 | Order |
| 17-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Ambajogai rejected Sohel's anticipatory bail application in a house-breaking and theft case involving Rs. 11,07,500 in stolen valuables. The court found that the serious organized nature of the crime, Sohel's subsequent naming after co-accused arrests suggesting involvement in property disposal, and the need for custodial interrogation to recover remaining stolen items outweighed bail considerations under the triple test for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Ambajogai rejected Sohel's anticipatory bail application in a house-breaking and theft case involving Rs. 11,07,500 in stolen valuables. The court found that the serious organized nature of the crime, Sohel's subsequent naming after co-accused arrests suggesting involvement in property disposal, and the need for custodial interrogation to recover remaining stolen items outweighed bail considerations under the triple test for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts