STATE OF MAHARASHATRA vs Vrundavani Satish Fartare Advocate - Sawant S.S. — 189/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,238,3(5). Status: Charge. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBI010042472025
Next Hearing
22nd July 2026
Filing Number
2137/2025
Filing Date
19-12-2025
Registration No
189/2025
Registration Date
20-12-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Beed
Judge
1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.
FIR Details
FIR Number
439
Police Station
Shivajinagar P.S. Beed.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHATRA
Adv. Rakh B.S.
Respondent(s)
Vrundavani Satish Fartare Advocate - Sawant S.S.
Pruthaviraj Satish Phartare
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.
Charge
Charge
Charge
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | Charge |
| 10-04-2026 | Charge |
| 09-04-2026 | Charge |
| 07-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 04-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
BAIL GRANTED The Sessions Court at Beed allowed the bail application of accused Vrundavani Satish Fartare, charged under BNS sections 103, 238, and 3(5) (poisoning causing death) in a case involving the death of a 26-year-old widow. The court granted bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, finding insufficient evidence of forced poisoning and noting absence of external injuries, witness testimony, CDR records, and CCTV footage, while considering the accused's three minor children and immovable property as factors against absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
BAIL GRANTED The Sessions Court at Beed allowed the bail application of accused Vrundavani Satish Fartare, charged under BNS sections 103, 238, and 3(5) (poisoning causing death) in a case involving the death of a 26-year-old widow. The court granted bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, finding insufficient evidence of forced poisoning and noting absence of external injuries, witness testimony, CDR records, and CCTV footage, while considering the accused's three minor children and immovable property as factors against absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts