STATE OF MAHARASHATRA vs Vrundavani Satish Fartare Advocate - Sawant S.S. — 189/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,238,3(5). Status: Charge. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Charge Next hearing 22-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Case

CNR: MHBI010042472025

Filing Number

2137/2025

Filing Date

19-Dec-2025

Registration No

189/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Beed

Judge

1-Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

439

Police Station

Shivajinagar P.S. Beed.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,238,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHATRA

    Adv. Rakh B.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vrundavani Satish Fartare Advocate - Sawant S.S.

  2. 2.Pruthaviraj Satish Phartare

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-May-2026

    Charge

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Charge

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    BAIL GRANTED The Sessions Court at Beed allowed the bail application of accused Vrundavani Satish Fartare, charged under BNS sections 103, 238, and 3(5) (poisoning causing death) in a case involving the death of a 26-year-old widow. The court granted bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, finding insufficient evidence of forced poisoning and noting absence of external injuries, witness testimony, CDR records, and CCTV footage, while considering the accused's three minor children and immovable property as factors against absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Charge

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  7. 04-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  8. 01-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  10. 17-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  11. 12-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  12. 09-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  13. 05-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  14. 16-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  15. 06-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  16. 30-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  17. 16-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  18. 12-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  19. 05-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  20. 31-Dec-2025

    Reply/Say

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  21. 22-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  22. 20-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 19-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 189/2025

casestatus.in Summary

BAIL GRANTED The Sessions Court at Beed allowed the bail application of accused Vrundavani Satish Fartare, charged under BNS sections 103, 238, and 3(5) (poisoning causing death) in a case involving the death of a 26-year-old widow. The court granted bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, finding insufficient evidence of forced poisoning and noting absence of external injuries, witness testimony, CDR records, and CCTV footage, while considering the accused's three minor children and immovable property as factors against absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case