STATE OF MAHARASHATRA vs Bapu Alis Bapurao Uttam Kharade Advocate - Jagtap P.B. — 198/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,326,325,323,201,504,506,34. Status: Awaiting Muddemal. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHBI010039632023

Awaiting Muddemal

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

Filing Number

1780/2023

Filing Date

25-10-2023

Registration No

198/2023

Registration Date

26-10-2023

Court

District and Sessions Court , Beed

Judge

12-DIST.JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE, BEED.

FIR Details

FIR Number

345

Police Station

Ashti Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 307,326,325,323,201,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHATRA

Adv. Tidke Anil B.

Respondent(s)

Bapu Alis Bapurao Uttam Kharade Advocate - Jagtap P.B.

Sandip Alis Nana Bapurao Kharade

Kaveri Bapurao Kharade

Hearing History

Judge: 12-DIST.JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE, BEED.

09-04-2026

Awaiting Muddemal

12-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

18-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

05-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

13-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

13-12-2023
Order on Exhibit

Summary: Bail was granted to accused Sandip alias Nana s/o Bapurao Kharade in Sessions Case No. 198/2023 (C.R. No. 345/2023, Ashti Police Station, Beed) for offences under IPC Sections 307, 326, 325, 201, 504, 506 read with Section 34. The court found that since investigation was completed, charge-sheet filed, and the informant discharged from hospital, further detention was unwarranted. The accused was released on Personal Bond (PB) and Surety Bond (SB) of Rs. 30,000/- each, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, regular court attendance, and providing residential proofs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Bail was granted to accused Sandip alias Nana s/o Bapurao Kharade in Sessions Case No. 198/2023 (C.R. No. 345/2023, Ashti Police Station, Beed) for offences under IPC Sections 307, 326, 325, 201, 504, 506 read with Section 34. The court found that since investigation was completed, charge-sheet filed, and the informant discharged from hospital, further detention was unwarranted. The accused was released on Personal Bond (PB) and Surety Bond (SB) of Rs. 30,000/- each, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, regular court attendance, and providing residential proofs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Beed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case