Amol Madhukar Chavan vs Jaydatta Sahebrao Khedkar Advocate - Hange D.G. — 116/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Status: R and P Ready. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.

R and P Ready Next hearing 29-May-2026 this date has passed

Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal

CNR: MHBI010036632025

e-Filing Number

27-10-2025

Filing Number

1773/2025

Filing Date

27-Oct-2025

Registration No

116/2025

Registration Date

28-Oct-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Beed

Judge

2-Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amol Madhukar Chavan

    Adv. Z.A. Sayyed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jaydatta Sahebrao Khedkar Advocate - Hange D.G.

Case History

  1. 29-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    R and P Ready

    Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed

  4. 28-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The application filed by respondent Jaydatta Sahebrao Khedkar to withdraw Rs. 1,40,000 deposited by the appellant was allowed. The amount shall be paid to the respondent upon verification and his undertaking that if judgment is passed against him, he will deposit the amount back in court along with 4% interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed

  6. 04-Dec-2025

    Filing of Surety

    Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed

  7. 29-Nov-2025

    Filing of Surety

    Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed

  8. 01-Nov-2025

    Depositing Amount

    Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 27-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 116/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application filed by respondent Jaydatta Sahebrao Khedkar to withdraw Rs. 1,40,000 deposited by the appellant was allowed. The amount shall be paid to the respondent upon verification and his undertaking that if judgment is passed against him, he will deposit the amount back in court along with 4% interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case