STATE OF MAHARASHATRA vs Navnath Sakharam Mane — 198/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,351(2),351(3),3(5). Status: Filing of Surety. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHBI010036602025

Filing of Surety

Next Hearing

13th July 2026

Filing Number

1772/2025

Filing Date

27-10-2025

Registration No

198/2025

Registration Date

28-10-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Beed

Judge

3-DIST.JUDGE-2 ADDL.SESSSIONS JUDGE,BEED.

FIR Details

FIR Number

159

Police Station

Ashti Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,351(2),351(3),3(5)
Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Attrocities) Act Section 3(1)(r),3(1)(s)

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHATRA

Respondent(s)

Navnath Sakharam Mane

Chayya Navnath Mane

Hearing History

Judge: 3-DIST.JUDGE-2 ADDL.SESSSIONS JUDGE,BEED.

04-05-2026

Filing of Surety

08-04-2026

Order on Exh

12-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

11-02-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

09-01-2026

Appearance

Interim Orders

04-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary Bail Granted. The Special Judge (Atrocity), Beed allowed the bail application of accused No. 1 and 2 charged under sections 352, 351(2), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court confirmed the previously granted anticipatory bail order, finding no weapons assault allegations, no recovery, and no purpose in continued detention, despite prosecution's prima facie case arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Bail Granted. The Special Judge (Atrocity), Beed allowed the bail application of accused No. 1 and 2 charged under sections 352, 351(2), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court confirmed the previously granted anticipatory bail order, finding no weapons assault allegations, no recovery, and no purpose in continued detention, despite prosecution's prima facie case arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Beed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case