STATE OF MAHARASHATRA vs Krushna Gahininath Garje Advocate - दाणी बी.व्ही., Mahajan S.S., Mahajan S.S.Mahajan S.S., — 140/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 306,498(A),323,504,506,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBI010036022020
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
1292/2020
Filing Date
18-12-2020
Registration No
140/2020
Registration Date
19-12-2020
Court
District and Sessions Court , Beed
Judge
3-DIST.JUDGE-2 ADDL.SESSSIONS JUDGE,BEED.
FIR Details
FIR Number
278
Police Station
Ashti Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHATRA
Adv. Darade M.M., Darade M.M.
Respondent(s)
Krushna Gahininath Garje Advocate - दाणी बी.व्ही., Mahajan S.S., Mahajan S.S.Mahajan S.S.,
Gahininath Jagannath Garje
Adv. दाणी बी.व्ही.
Ashabai Gahininath Garje
Adv. Dani B.V.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-DIST.JUDGE-2 ADDL.SESSSIONS JUDGE,BEED.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: Bail granted to accused Krushna Gahininath Garje in Sessions Case No. 140/2020 on execution of a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 60,000 and one solvent surety of equal amount. The court imposed strict conditions requiring the accused's mandatory presence at every trial date without excuse, prohibition from committing further offences, and warned that any violation would result in immediate cancellation of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: Bail granted to accused Krushna Gahininath Garje in Sessions Case No. 140/2020 on execution of a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 60,000 and one solvent surety of equal amount. The court imposed strict conditions requiring the accused's mandatory presence at every trial date without excuse, prohibition from committing further offences, and warned that any violation would result in immediate cancellation of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts