Komal Wo Vikram Waghmare vs Ranjeet Kanubhau Soloanke — 159/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 05th May 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI010035332025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-10-2025

Filing Number

1696/2025

Filing Date

10-10-2025

Registration No

159/2025

Registration Date

13-10-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Beed

Judge

1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 408

Petitioner(s)

Komal Wo Vikram Waghmare

Adv. More U.D.

Respondent(s)

Ranjeet Kanubhau Soloanke

STATE OF MAHARASHATRA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.

05-05-2026

Disposed

21-04-2026

Arguments

31-03-2026

Steps_Unready

12-03-2026

Awaiting Notice

11-02-2026

Awaiting Notice

Final Orders / Judgements

05-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Sessions Court at Beed allowed the transfer petition and ordered that Special (Atrocity) Case No. 15/2023 and Sessions Case No. 112/2023 be consolidated and tried together before the Ad-hoc District Judge at Kaij. The court found both cases arose from the same incident on 12/09/2017 at the same location and time, with witnesses in one case being accused in the other, making joint trial appropriate to avoid conflicting decisions and ensure judicial efficiency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court at Beed allowed the transfer petition and ordered that Special (Atrocity) Case No. 15/2023 and Sessions Case No. 112/2023 be consolidated and tried together before the Ad-hoc District Judge at Kaij. The court found both cases arose from the same incident on 12/09/2017 at the same location and time, with witnesses in one case being accused in the other, making joint trial appropriate to avoid conflicting decisions and ensure judicial efficiency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Beed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case