STATE OF MAHARASHATRA vs Rushikesh Bapusaheb Khandare Advocate - Sagale V.K. — 162/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,143,147,148,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBI010032512023
Filing Number
1431/2023
Filing Date
01-09-2023
Registration No
162/2023
Registration Date
02-09-2023
Court
District and Sessions Court , Beed
Judge
1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
651
Police Station
Shivajinagar P.S. Beed.
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHATRA
Adv. Tandale A.S.
Respondent(s)
Rushikesh Bapusaheb Khandare Advocate - Sagale V.K.
Ashish Arjun Nagargoje
Sandip Balasaheb Dahifale
Prajoyt Prataprao Rakh
Dipak Babasaheb Maske
Amol Marotirao Vitkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Court, Beed acquitted five of six accused persons (Rushikesh Khandare, Ashish Nagargoje, Sandip Dahiphale, Prajyot Rakh, and Amol Vitkar) of charges under IPC Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 504, 506 and Maharashtra Police Act Section 135, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case when the informant and injured eyewitnesses turned hostile and denied the incident. A supplementary charge-sheet was directed against the sixth accused (Dipak Maske). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Sessions Court, Beed acquitted five of six accused persons (Rushikesh Khandare, Ashish Nagargoje, Sandip Dahiphale, Prajyot Rakh, and Amol Vitkar) of charges under IPC Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 504, 506 and Maharashtra Police Act Section 135, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case when the informant and injured eyewitnesses turned hostile and denied the incident. A supplementary charge-sheet was directed against the sixth accused (Dipak Maske). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts