STATE OF MAHARASHATRA vs Sayyad Badshaha Sayyad Mahebub Advocate - Chavan B.F. — 151/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376(2,n),323,506. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBI010030562023
Filing Number
1333/2023
Filing Date
18-Aug-2023
Registration No
151/2023
Registration Date
19-Aug-2023
Court
District and Sessions Court , Beed
Judge
2-Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed
Last updated 25-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
59
Police Station
Georai Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHATRA
Adv. Qazi A.Z.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sayyad Badshaha Sayyad Mahebub Advocate - Chavan B.F.
-
2.Shaikh Faij Sahikh Sheru
Adv. Sanap V.S.
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-May-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed
-
07-May-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed
-
10-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence
Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence
Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed
-
15-Nov-2025
Evidence
Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed
-
18-Oct-2025
Evidence
Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed
-
31-Jul-2025
Fixing date of Hearing
Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed
-
26-May-2025
Awaiting Muddemal
Dist.judge-1 Addl.sessions Judge, Beed.
-
28-Mar-2025
Awaiting Muddemal
Dist.judge-1 Addl.sessions Judge, Beed.
-
24-Feb-2025
Awaiting Muddemal
Dist.judge-1 Addl.sessions Judge, Beed.
-
04-Feb-2025
Charge
Dist.judge-1 Addl.sessions Judge, Beed.
-
12-Dec-2024
Charge
Dist.judge-1 Addl.sessions Judge, Beed.
-
10-Oct-2024
Charge
Dist.judge-1 Addl.sessions Judge, Beed.
-
31-Jul-2024
Charge
Dist.judge-1 Addl.sessions Judge, Beed.
-
17-May-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
SUMMARY: The accused's application under Section 451 Cr.P.C. for return of a Vivo V-25 Pro mobile phone seized in CR No. 59/2023 (involving charges under IPC Sections 376(2)(n), 323, 506) was rejected. The court found that the mobile, which was allegedly used during the offense, had been sent to FSL for forensic analysis and was not in police custody, making return inappropriate at this stage of the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-May-2024
Charge
Dist.judge-1 Addl.sessions Judge, Beed.
-
10-May-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Dist.judge-1 Addl.sessions Judge, Beed.
-
09-Feb-2024
Charge
Dist.judge-1 Addl.sessions Judge, Beed.
-
06-Dec-2023
Charge
Dist.judge-1 Addl.sessions Judge, Beed.
-
01-Sep-2023
Charge
Dist.judge-1 Addl.sessions Judge, Beed.
-
19-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 151/2023
SUMMARY: The accused's application under Section 451 Cr.P.C. for return of a Vivo V-25 Pro mobile phone seized in CR No. 59/2023 (involving charges under IPC Sections 376(2)(n), 323, 506) was rejected. The court found that the mobile, which was allegedly used during the offense, had been sent to FSL for forensic analysis and was not in police custody, making return inappropriate at this stage of the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts