JJLB Engineers and Contractors vs The Executive Director GMIDC — 278/2024

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34(2). Status: Steps. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI010030262024

Steps

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

e-Filing Number

04-09-2024

Filing Number

1514/2024

Filing Date

12-09-2024

Registration No

278/2024

Registration Date

13-09-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court , Beed

Judge

3-DIST.JUDGE-2 ADDL.SESSSIONS JUDGE,BEED.

Acts & Sections

ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT Section 34(2)

Petitioner(s)

JJLB Engineers and Contractors

Adv. PARDE ANIL BALAJIRAO

Respondent(s)

The Executive Director GMIDC

Anand Kumar Jain

G S Lokhande Arbitrator

S K Ghanekar Co Arbitrator

Hearing History

Judge: 3-DIST.JUDGE-2 ADDL.SESSSIONS JUDGE,BEED.

07-04-2026

Steps

17-03-2026

Steps

12-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

06-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

26-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Interim Orders

17-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The application for transfer of Civil M.A. No. 278/2024 was allowed. The matter involving M/s. JJLB (Engineers & Contractors) and a construction contract dispute for Paithan Right Bank Canal was transferred from the District Court to District Judge-2 at Beed, designated as the Commercial Court, as the dispute qualifies as a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 with sufficient monetary value based on the original claim of Rs. 7.32 Lakhs, Rs. 19.70 Lakhs, and Rs. 1.76 Lakhs in various heads. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application for transfer of Civil M.A. No. 278/2024 was allowed. The matter involving M/s. JJLB (Engineers & Contractors) and a construction contract dispute for Paithan Right Bank Canal was transferred from the District Court to District Judge-2 at Beed, designated as the Commercial Court, as the dispute qualifies as a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 with sufficient monetary value based on the original claim of Rs. 7.32 Lakhs, Rs. 19.70 Lakhs, and Rs. 1.76 Lakhs in various heads. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Beed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case