Uttam s/o Rambhau Korde vs Pawan s/o Balnath Shinde Advocate - Dabhade A.R. — 365/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition

CNR: MHBI010030212024

e-Filing Number

11-09-2024

Filing Number

1510/2024

Filing Date

12-Sep-2024

Registration No

365/2024

Registration Date

19-Sep-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court , Beed

Judge

1-Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Uttam s/o Rambhau Korde

    Adv. Amol Landge

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pawan s/o Balnath Shinde Advocate - Dabhade A.R.

  2. 2.IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance co. Ltd.

    Adv. Bade A.S.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Beed approved a compromise settlement between claimant Uttam Korde and respondent No.2 (Insurance company) during National Lok-Adalat proceedings on May 9, 2026. The insurance company was directed to deposit Rs. 2,25,000 to the claimant's designated bank account, with the proceeding against respondent No.1 withdrawn. Court fees were ordered refunded to the claimant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Written Statement

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Written Statement

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  9. 23-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  10. 24-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  11. 13-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  12. 06-Oct-2025

    Steps

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  13. 18-Sep-2025

    Steps

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  14. 10-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  15. 08-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  16. 29-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  17. 14-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  18. 27-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  19. 17-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  20. 13-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  21. 21-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  22. 16-Jan-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  23. 04-Dec-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  24. 27-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  25. 21-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  26. 19-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 12-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 365/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Beed approved a compromise settlement between claimant Uttam Korde and respondent No.2 (Insurance company) during National Lok-Adalat proceedings on May 9, 2026. The insurance company was directed to deposit Rs. 2,25,000 to the claimant's designated bank account, with the proceeding against respondent No.1 withdrawn. Court fees were ordered refunded to the claimant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case