STATE OF MAHARASHATRA vs Shaikh Ansar Sahikh Babamiya Advocate - Shaikh S. B. — 134/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,353,332,201,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBI010028152023
Filing Number
1234/2023
Filing Date
04-Aug-2023
Registration No
134/2023
Registration Date
05-Aug-2023
Court
District and Sessions Court , Beed
Judge
7-Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 25-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
346
Police Station
Pimpalner Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHATRA
Adv. Tidke Anil B.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shaikh Ansar Sahikh Babamiya Advocate - Shaikh S. B.
-
2.Shaikh Faruq Shaikh Sharif Bagwan
-
3.Shaikh Samshir Shaikh Feroj
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge in Beed acquitted all three accused (Shaikh Ansar, Shaikh Faruk, and Shaikh Samshir) of charges under IPC Sections 379, 353, 332, and 201, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged illegal sand transportation, assault on a public servant, or obstruction of duty. The court noted critical gaps: the prosecution's sole eyewitness (the informant) failed to provide full identification details, no independent witnesses were examined, and no medical evidence corroborated claims of hurt caused to the informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
-
31-Mar-2026
Arguments
Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
-
27-Mar-2026
Arguments
Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
-
25-Mar-2026
Arguments
Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
-
11-Mar-2026
Arguments
Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
-
04-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
-
18-Feb-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
18-Feb-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
-
06-Feb-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
-
29-Jan-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence
Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
-
12-Dec-2025
List of Witness
Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
-
20-Nov-2025
ChargeView PDF
-
20-Nov-2025
List of Witness
Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
-
06-Nov-2025
Charge
Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
-
15-Oct-2025
Charge
Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed
-
20-Aug-2025
Charge
Dist.judge-1 Addl.sessions Judge, Beed.
-
19-Jun-2025
Charge
Dist.judge-1 Addl.sessions Judge, Beed.
-
03-Apr-2025
Charge
Dist.judge-2 Addl.sesssions Judge,beed.
-
03-Feb-2025
Charge
Dist.judge-2 Addl.sesssions Judge,beed.
-
09-Dec-2024
Charge
Dist.judge-2 Addl.sesssions Judge,beed.
-
06-Nov-2024
Charge
Dist.judge-2 Addl.sesssions Judge,beed.
-
26-Sep-2024
Charge
Dist.judge-2 Addl.sesssions Judge,beed.
-
26-Jun-2024
Charge
Dist.judge-2 Addl.sesssions Judge,beed.
-
25-Apr-2024
Charge
Dist.judge-2 Addl.sesssions Judge,beed.
-
22-Feb-2024
Charge
Dist.judge-2 Addl.sesssions Judge,beed.
-
15-Dec-2023
Charge
Dist.judge-2 Addl.sesssions Judge,beed.
-
25-Sep-2023
Charge
Dist.judge-2 Addl.sesssions Judge,beed.
-
23-Aug-2023
Filing of Surety
Dist.judge-2 Addl.sesssions Judge,beed.
-
05-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 134/2023
The Additional Sessions Judge in Beed acquitted all three accused (Shaikh Ansar, Shaikh Faruk, and Shaikh Samshir) of charges under IPC Sections 379, 353, 332, and 201, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged illegal sand transportation, assault on a public servant, or obstruction of duty. The court noted critical gaps: the prosecution's sole eyewitness (the informant) failed to provide full identification details, no independent witnesses were examined, and no medical evidence corroborated claims of hurt caused to the informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts