STATE OF MAHARASHATRA vs Samad Mohammad Tahasirdar Advocate - Sawant S.S. — 78/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,376,376(2)(j). Status: N.B.W._Ready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHBI010025002022

N.B.W._Ready

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

Filing Number

971/2022

Filing Date

02-07-2022

Registration No

78/2022

Registration Date

04-07-2022

Court

District and Sessions Court , Beed

Judge

7-Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed

FIR Details

FIR Number

160

Police Station

Rural Police Station Beed

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 363,376,376(2)(j)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHATRA

Adv. Birangal R.B.

Respondent(s)

Samad Mohammad Tahasirdar Advocate - Sawant S.S.

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Adhoc Dist. Judge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge Beed

22-05-2026

N.B.W._Ready

05-05-2026

N.B.W._Ready

12-03-2026

N.B.W._Ready

02-02-2026

N.B.W._Ready

16-12-2025

N.B.W._Ready

Interim Orders

12-08-2022
Order on Exhibit

Summary: Bail application granted. Accused Samad Mohammad Tahasildar was released on bail in Special POCSO Case No. 78/2022 (kidnapping and rape of a 15-year-old minor) upon executing a personal recognizance and surety of Rs. 25,000 each, with conditions including mandatory court attendance, providing permanent address, and not leaving Beed district without court permission. The court found evidence of a consensual relationship despite the victim being a minor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Bail application granted. Accused Samad Mohammad Tahasildar was released on bail in Special POCSO Case No. 78/2022 (kidnapping and rape of a 15-year-old minor) upon executing a personal recognizance and surety of Rs. 25,000 each, with conditions including mandatory court attendance, providing permanent address, and not leaving Beed district without court permission. The court found evidence of a consensual relationship despite the victim being a minor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Beed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case