Vidya Shrihari Pawar vs Vikas Ajinath Palve — 270/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHBI010020192021
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
990/2021
Filing Date
13-08-2021
Registration No
270/2021
Registration Date
18-08-2021
Court
District and Sessions Court , Beed
Judge
2-Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vidya Shrihari Pawar
Adv. Dabade D.M.
Samarth Shrihari Pawar u/g Claimant No.1
Akshata Shrihari Pawar
Mahananda Navnath Pawar
Navnath Kashinath Pawar
Respondent(s)
Vikas Ajinath Palve
ICICI General Insu. Co.Ltd.
Adv. Bade A.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Adhoc Dist Judge-1 and Addl. Sess Judge Beed
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 22-01-2026 | Compliance |
| 01-12-2025 | Compliance |
| 06-10-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Beed allowed the No Fault Liability (NFL) petition filed by the widow and family members of Shrihari Navnath Pawar, who died from injuries sustained in a motorcycle accident on 01/03/2020. The tribunal ordered the respondents (vehicle owner and driver) to jointly and severally deposit Rs. 50,000 with 7% per annum interest to the claimants within one month, payable by crossed cheque. The tribunal held that compensation under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act could be granted based on the involvement of the offending motor vehicle, without requiring proof of fault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Beed allowed the No Fault Liability (NFL) petition filed by the widow and family members of Shrihari Navnath Pawar, who died from injuries sustained in a motorcycle accident on 01/03/2020. The tribunal ordered the respondents (vehicle owner and driver) to jointly and severally deposit Rs. 50,000 with 7% per annum interest to the claimants within one month, payable by crossed cheque. The tribunal held that compensation under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act could be granted based on the involvement of the offending motor vehicle, without requiring proof of fault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts